Pages

February 24, 2017

Forget detached, the average price for all new low-rise housing in Toronto is past $1 million now

All types of low-rise housing in Toronto are now selling for an average of $1 million, builders say.

It’s no longer just new detached homes that are selling for more than a $1 million, the average price of any ground level housing in the Greater Toronto Area is now seven figures.

The Building Industry and Land Development Association said Thursday that the average single-family low-rise home — which includes detached, semi-detached, row and townhomes — sold for $1,028,395 in January.

Altus Group, which provides the data for BILD, said prices for ground level housing climbed 25 per cent in one year.
The average price of a new detached home reached a record $1,316,325 last month, up from $444,368 10 years ago. The average price of a new GTA townhouse was $879,619 last month compared to $328,989 in January 2007.

“The GTA is facing a severe shortage of housing supply, particularly for single-family homes which sell as soon as they come to market,” said Bryan Tuckey, chief executive of BILD. “When there aren’t enough homes to satisfy demand, prices increase and that is exactly what has been happening in our region over the last decade.”

Related

  • There’s a new culprit for Toronto’s so-called housing bubble: move-up buyers

The group said there were just 1,524 new ground-oriented homes available for purchase in builders’ inventories at the end of January, close to a record low. A decade ago, the inventory level was 18,400. The supply of new detached home
dropped to 534 last month, a record low for the GTA. Ten years ago there were 12,242 unsold detached homes.

BILD also said the average price of new condominium apartments in stacked townhouses and mid and high-rise buildings in the GTA reached a record price of $507,511 in January. On a square foot basis, that brought the average price to a record $625.

New apartment prices were up 13 per cent in January from a year ago which is about a $60,000 increase. A decade ago the average price was $322,569.

“Our industry is implementing provincial policy by building more condominium apartments and less ground-oriented housing,” Tuckey said. “A decade ago condominiums represented just 42 per cent of available inventory compared to 88 per cent in 2017.”

fp0223-bild_new_homes

BILD said the industry is now seeing supply levels dip rapidly in the condo market. In January 2017 there were 11,529 new condominiums in builders’ inventories across the GTA, a 10-year low. Overall there were 13,053 new homes in builders’ inventories across the region in January compared to 31,461 a decade ago.

“Today in the GTA there are less than half the overall number of new homes available to purchase than there were a decade ago,” Tuckey said. “Lack of serviced developable land, excessive red tape and frequent delays in the development approval process have all been large contributors to our housing supply crisis.”

Demand continues to ramp up in the condo sector too with new sales the best ever for January which comes on the heels of record sales in 2016. There were 1,199 condo homes sold across the GTA in January, up 11 per cent from a year ago. The city of Toronto recorded a majority of the sales.

“Demand for condominium apartments is coming from a variety of sources,” said Patricia Arsenault, executive vice president of research Consulting Services at Altus Group. “Among them: end users who prefer the locations and amenities afforded by condominium apartments; families who might have opted for a single-family home, but have been shut out of that segment due to lack of available product; and investors who are the key providers of new rental supply for the GTA’s growing population.”

gmarr@postmedia.com
twitter.com/dustywallet

Jay Onrait and Dan O’Toole are out at FS1. Will they return to TSN?

At TSN Jay Onrait and Dan O

Four years after making their move south of the border, Jay Onrait and Dan O’Toole have been let go by Fox Sports.

Could a return to TSN be in the works? The duo were a very, very popular feature of TSN’s SportsCentre programming. They brought a wry sense of humour to every project they were involved with and built a mass following.

FS1 cancels "Fox Sports Live;" Jay and Dan's contracts not likely to be renewed. Story coming in SportsBusiness Daily.

— John Ourand (@Ourand_SBJ) February 23, 2017

Here’s the thing: the sports news landscape has changed. Nightly highlights shows don’t do the numbers they once did. Fox Sports 1 in general struggled to pull numbers away from ESPN, and ESPN itself has seen its numbers decline overall. Onrait and O’Toole were hired to lead FS1’s main highlights show and the hope was their personalities would draw viewers away from ESPN. It didn’t work. American TV numbers just don’t work like they did at the height of the Olbermann/Patrick era.

The road to Hollywood: Jay Onrait and Dan O'Toole say goodbye to TSN

In __canada it’s a similar story, with TSN SportsCentre and Sportsnet Central both struggling to maintain their former footholds.

TSN doesn’t have an afternoon chat show anymore; they cancelled Off the Record with Michael Landsberg at the end of 2015. Sportsnet’s Tim and Sid has done alright in the afternoon time slot, especially during Blue Jays season ,and their demographic is skewed towards males 25-to-40. In the winter Tim and Sid pull in 50 to 60k. Blue Jays chatter pushes them closer to 100k in the summer time. They’ve had shows that have hit even higher on a one-off.

Related

  • Scott Stinson: As youth renounce TV and subscribers flee from ESPN, sports cable bubble has to pop eventually
  • Canadians loving the NFL this season as TV ratings run opposite to the dips in American viewership

When many overnight programs pull numbers that might as well be zero, target zones like the afternoon slot might be worth it.

In a weird way, losing the NHL might even have been to TSN’s advantage. Their budget may not be as big as it was, but it’s more flexible now. They don’t have to automatically commit resources to hockey.

Silver lining for @JayOnrait after cancellation of @foxsportslive — Hearing he will be returning to @TSN_Sports in Canada.

— jamesmiller (@JimMiller) February 23, 2017

With that in mind, there’s a good chance they chase one or both of their former SportsCentre stars to put up a show in the afternoon time slot to take on Tim and Sid. Jim Miller, who wrote the book on ESPN’s history and is regular media commentator, reports Onrait (at least) will be returning to TSN.

Jay Onrait is a CAA guy. Miller is a terrific reporter and wrote the book on CAA. So…… https://t.co/mFxxFXCZ6Y

— Richard Deitsch (@richarddeitsch) February 23, 2017

The interesting twist, as noted by Sports Illustrated’s media reporter Richard Deitsch, is Jay Onrait is represented by powerhouse agency CAA. If Onrait were to return to his old stomping grounds, it wouldn’t be for nothing.

Goaltenders shine as New York Rangers defeat Toronto Maple Leafs in shootout

Toronto Maple Leafs

When Frederik Andersen and Henrik Lundqvist tapped blockers after Thursday night’s overtime, no words needed to be exchanged.

“A fun goalie battle, we have big respect for each other,” Toronto Maple Leafs’ keeper Andersen said. “But obviously, I’d rather be on the winning side.”

Toronto fell 2-1 to the New York Rangers in a shootout, a valuable point going out the door with the visitors, but the Leafs exited still in third place in the Atlantic Division. That was in large part to Andersen’s work early in the game.

“I don’t like to see him have to be as good as he was tonight,” said Leafs head coach Mike Babcock. “They put a lot of pressure on him right from the get-go. They man-handled us last time we played (a 5-2 Ranger win). I thought they were quicker than us tonight and dominated face-offs (67 per cent).

“But that was a really big point. The best thing tonight was that Freddy was Freddy.”

Lundqvist, meanwhile, came in with a record of 9-2-1 in his last 12 for the surging Rangers and a .936 save percentage. The two goalies combined for 71 saves over 65 minutes including 30 by Lundqvist. Many were of the show-stopper variety, particularly in three-on-three overtime when big guns such as Auston Matthews of the Leafs and Rick Nash and Mats Zuccarello of the Rangers broke in alone with glorious chances.

“I think everyone in hockey wanted that overtime to keep going,” Andersen said. “It was a good overtime, but we haven’t had that much success (1-7 in shootouts this season).”

Related

  • Leafs' Nazem Kadri showed his best, most irritating game against Winnipeg Jets
  • Leafs rookie William Nylander parlays dazzling skill into 'a lot' of power-play goals

The entertainment value was already reaped by the crowd at the Air __canada Centre before shootout goals by Zuccarello and Mika Zibanejad, countered only by Matthews.

Babcock grumbled about few Leafs skating hard enough, other than William Nylander getting singled out for praise in that area. The Leafs nearly did get it together and came close to a regulation win when Zach Hyman fed Morgan Rielly whose shot rang off the crossbar. Rielly played in excess of 24 regulation minutes on the blue line in one of his better performances of the season.

Andersen’s potential shutout almost survived a third period call on Nikita Zaitsev, for a whack at a breaking Zuccarello, who was trying to build on his 16 points in 12 games against Toronto. But J.T. Miller banged in a rebound as Zaitsev exited the box with 9:50 to go in the game.

Not that this stat can be laid at the feet of this year’s Leafs, but they became the first club in National Hockey League history to allow 20,000 regular-season goals. Montreal, by comparison, is barely past 17,000 as the leanest times in the past 50 Cup-less years for Toronto have come back to haunt the franchise in this respect.

Andersen established himself in the first period when the Rangers pressed or his mates were too careless with the puck. Toronto’s league-leading power play was one of his biggest headaches in facing 14 shots when the Rangers were swarming despite the disadvantage. Ex-Leafs’ Michael Grabner had the best chance while shorthanded but Andersen stretched back across the crease and got a pad on the low drive.

Matthews, the Leafs’ leading scorer, had a breakaway in overtime and a shootout chance on Lundqvist, opting for a shot over a deke.

“I saw an opening in the shootout, but he moves laterally really well,” said Matthews. “He’s not the biggest goalie, but he never quits on pucks.”

When it comes to the Leafs, strange things have happened for Lundqvist. His career .901 career percentage against them coming in is his worst other than the Canadiens in the conference.

When the Rangers left the Leafs too much room on the perimeter in the first period, Connor Brown started the play with a pass to the point and was there to finish the play, banging in a rebound from Tyler Bozak via Jake Gardiner to account for the Leafs’ early 1-0 lead. The goal gave the Leafs four rookies with 15 or more goals for the first season in team history and for Brown, just making it to his 60th game was worth a $50,000 US contract bonus. The Leafs have still not lost in regulation when Brown scores, up to 11-0-2.

His was also the 91st goal by a Leaf rookie and bumped the freshmen total to 229 this season. They will have to finish big in the remaining 22 games, but still have a shot at the Los Angeles Kings’ NHL record of 344 points by rookies in 1967-68.

LHornby@postmedia.com

For Sale: Former coach house in London, England for £595,000

This former coach house was part of Lady Byron’s School for poor children, which opened in Ealing, in the west end of London, England, in 1834. Now it’s a three-storey, two-bedroom house in a sought after neighbourhood. The only catch is the home is eight-feet wide. Perfect for some creative, small space decorating.

House of the day

Homes and cottages we’d love to have — whether we can afford them or not

Key details:
• 560 sq. ft.
• 2 bedrooms, 2 shower rooms
• Communal garden
• £595,000
• Matthew Gilbert, Savills Ealing, +44 (0)208.018.7100
• See full listing here

Savills

It’s believed this used to be the entrance for horses and carts.

Savills

The building was used as a school until 1917.

Savills

The kitchen and dining area are on the main floor.

Savills

The top two storeys have equal-sized rooms, which can be used as bedrooms, or as a bedroom and a living room.

Savills

The home is close to shops, Walpole Park and public transport.

If you have an interesting listing, reno or just a really neat home — whether it’s for sale or not, drop us a line to tell us about it.

Related

  • House of the day archive

Millennials rank conservative political parties as least trustworthy, pollster tells Conservative conference

Conservative leadership contender Kevin O

OTTAWA — Conservative political parties are the institutions the least trusted by Canadians aged 15-34, researchers told a Manning Centre Conference audience Friday.

Young people, according to a survey commissioned for the centre, trust right-wing parties less than they trust all levels of government, left-leaning parties, corporations and unions, among other institutions.

It proves a challenge for the group of conservative thinkers that has descended on Ottawa for discussions over the future of their federal party, and for a leadership debate Friday afternoon.

Some Conservative Party leadership candidates have made the millennial vote a priority. Political outsider and reality TV personality Kevin O’Leary has repeatedly promised since launching his campaign that he’d bring young people back into the fold in droves — despite youth being a traditionally tricky group for conservatives to appeal to.

Related

  • Andrew Coyne: A dark road beckons Canada’s Conservatives and the Manning Conference is speeding their way
  • Preston Manning’s message to Conservative leadership candidates: Don’t take party unity for granted
  • Kelly McParland: Who will save the Conservative Party from self-destruction?

The panel Friday morning was led by Heather Scott-Marshall, president of Mission Research, who collected polling data, and Ted Kouri, the co-founder of marketing firm Incite, who collected qualitative data from Alberta youth.

They concluded that issues such as balancing the budget, fostering the shared economy and supporting entrepreneurs could offer Conservatives a chance at the millennial voting pool. But according to Scott-Marshall’s presentation, only 16 per cent of young Canadians identify as conservative and 20 per cent as right-of-centre on the political spectrum, according to data.

The numbers are based on an online survey last October of 2,000 people, aged 15-34, accurate within 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. The age group represents 27 per cent of Canadians and 37 per cent of the labour force.

A full two-thirds of millennials feel __canada is “on the right track,” but only 10 per cent felt “strongly” about that, according to the survey. Only 26 per cent felt the country is going in the wrong direction, and eight per cent “strongly” so.

More challenging for conservatives — and in many ways a branding issue, as Kouri noted — is that few millennials are ready to identify themselves as conservatives. One in three see themselves as liberals; another 18 per cent say they’re centrist, and only 16 per cent conservative. Rounding out the list: 14 per cent identify as progressive, 11 per cent as socialist and seven per cent as libertarian.

With the question put another way, as a spot on the political spectrum, about 32 per cent put themselves in the “centre,” 26 per cent left of centre and 20 per cent right of centre (with five per cent putting themselves on the “extreme right”).

On two issues highlighted by Scott-Marshall, millennials could find some common ground with the conservative movement. Youths overwhelmingly — at 82 per cent — feel federal budget deficits and the national debt are a “major problem,” with 40 per cent saying it should be addressed right away. And almost half, or 46 per cent, like the idea of a two-track public and private health care system rather than the status quo.

Still, trust will be a major issue for the Tories. On average, young people rated their trust in conservative political parties at 4.3 out of 10, the lowest of any group, while trusting themselves nearly twice as much (8.2 out of 10) and left-wing political parties at a level of 5.3 out of 10.

Policymakers take note: in focus groups with Albertans aged 18 to 35, Kouri said young folk felt Conservatives are “out of touch” on social issues such as minority rights and immigration.

They are also “definitely turned off” by rhetoric suggesting climate change is not an important issue, and want “a strong, clear approach or policy,” he added.

Email: mdsmith@postmedia.com | Twitter: mariedanielles

Why the Oscars matter, as a lens on culture and a resource for film appreciation

Why the Oscars — with their lack of awareness and diversity, and abundance of mediocrity — don’t matter

By Calum Marsh

It is the film critic’s perennial duty, it seems, to address the Academy Awards – a phenomenon that is in no way critic-borne. Round about this time of year, you see, a lot of broadsheet editors and TV news producers with otherwise very little interest in the movies suddenly determine that a multi-million dollar televised awards ceremony in Los Angeles warrants their attention.

And so people like me, who are paid to think and write about films every week as a niche metier, are for a short while called upon by radio programs and morning news shows to offer expert commentary on the year’s nominees. It’s sort of like the Olympics or the World Cup in that way: for a week or so everyone gets to feign a stake in a pastime they could hardly give a damn about any other day of the year.

But at least the Olympics and the World Cup have legitimate claims to authority. Sportswriters deeply invested in the cutting-edge vicissitudes of soccer or track and field day-to-day probably care a great deal about how these games transpire at the highest level, and I doubt very much that even the exaggerated furor of the mainstream media can interfere with the nuts-and-bolts pleasure of watching the best athletes in the world fairly compete. The Oscars simply aren’t that kind of competition…

Read more here.

Google “why the Oscars matter” and you’ll find no end to reasons why they don’t. The arguments are numerous but simple: The Academy Awards presentation, now in its 89th year, is too old, too staid, too out of touch, #stilltoowhite, what-have-you.

But it remains a vital part of a conversation that continues to evolve around the serious business of “cinema,” the frivolity of “movies,” and whatever side of the coin currently features the grinning face of Nicolas Cage. Without the Academy and its evening-eating awards show, film appreciation would be a lopsided discussion.

There are several ways to measure a movie’s success. Box-office figures give us bums-in-seats – or, more specifically, dollars spent on those bums, which isn’t quite the same thing since the kids clamouring to see LEGO Batman require cheaper tickets than the Fifty Shades Darker crowd.

Critics (ahem) are another good indicator – tireless cinephiles who watch upwards of 300 movies a year and weigh in on what’s best. Sometimes their tastes match the multiplex crowds, as with Zootopia (98 per cent at rottentomatoes, seventh place at the 2016 box office) and Moana (95 per cent, 11th place).

Other times, critics will savage a movie like Suicide Squad (a dismal 26 per cent) but fail to stop audiences turning out to see it; it was ninth at the box office last year, earning $325 million. And the reverse can be found in a film like Hell or High Water, which was one of the highest rated films by critics last year, but barely squeaked into the top 100 at the box office, with $27 million.

These discrepancies also hinge on how widely a film is released; Suicide Squad opened on 4,255 screens, whereas Hell or High Water managed little more than a third of that at its peak. You can’t love the movie you can’t see.

But Hell or High Water also has four Oscar nominations – for Best Picture, Film Editing, Original Screenplay and Jeff Bridges (his seventh!) for Best Supporting Actor. (Though if you ask me, 88-year-old Margaret Bowman was robbed of a Best Supporting Actress nomination for her turn as West Texas’s crankiest waitress.) For many who haven’t yet seen this worthy film, its Oscar nominations might be their introduction.

Which brings us to the third leg of the film discussion; Hollywood, and the people who actually make the films. Say what you will about the pampered moviemaking elite; they know firsthand the difficulty of financing, casting, production budgets and cinematography. Heck, they even know the difference between sound editing and sound design, and how to wrangle both Johnny Depp’s hair and the man himself.

The almost 7,000 members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences also comprise one of the largest voting blocks in the industry. The Golden Globes may have been making inroads as the swankier, more entertaining show, but its prizes remain based on the opinions of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, a tiny (about 90 strong) group of foreign (i.e., not American) journalists (i.e., not critics) based in Southern California.

You wouldn’t want the Academy owning the discussion of what constitutes an important film. Over the decades, it has committed some blistering blunders, such as passing over Saving Private Ryan and naming Shakespeare in Love Best Picture, or skipping 2001: A Space Odyssey in favour of Oliver! The last “classic” movie I watched, 1933’s King Kong, didn’t receive a single nomination. Yet who remembers that year’s Best Picture winner, Cavalcade?

But when the Oscars get it right, they can drive film conversations (and conventions) for years to come. The year after Kong, It Happened One Night became the first movie to win all five major awards – picture, director, actress, actor and screenplay. That feat has been equalled only twice since, by One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest in 1975 and The Silence of the Lambs in 1991. It Happened One Night remains a template for the era’s screwball comedies and the rom-coms into which they evolved.

The Oscars can often collide with real-world issues, too; take last year’s Best Picture winner, Spotlight, and the recognition it afforded the mainstream news media, recently branded the “enemy of the American people” by the U.S. President.

Other recent Best Picture winners have turned a lens on slavery (12 Years a Slave), warfare (The Hurt Locker) and poverty (Slumdog Millionaire). Although it must be said that every second year seems to celebrate Hollywood itself – Birdman, Argo, The Artist, etc. – and this would seem to augur that La La Land will beat out Moonlight next weekend; it’s Hollywood’s year to shine.

But an awards show can be at once self-congratulatory, glitzy, superficial AND important. The Oscars are never going to be the Pulitzer or the Nobel; not as long as the chief requirement for entry in the club is being easy on the eyes and looking good in formal wear. But that doesn’t mean they can’t also address reality.

This was true in 1973, when Marlon Brando refused his Best Actor Oscar for The Godfather, and sent a Native American proxy to explain that it was because of Hollywood’s treatment of First Nations actors. It was true last year, when Leonardo DiCaprio used his win for The Revenant to call attention to the issue of climate change, which the White House now refuses to accept.

Related

  • Why the Oscars — with their lack of awareness and diversity, and abundance of mediocrity — don’t matter
  • Pushing the envelope: Who will win – and who should win – at Sunday’s Academy Awards
  • #OscarsSoWoke: This year’s Academy Awards are bound to be political, and that’s not a bad thing

This year’s Oscars could produce a bumper crop of political statements, if recent comments by Meryl Streep at the Golden Globes and just about everyone at the Screen Actors Guild awards are any indication. In fact, it could be a year in which who wins is outshone by what they choose to say, and how it is received by those in power.

But even in less divisive times, the Academy Awards provide a rare confluence of entertainment and introspection. Just what does it mean to be a great movie, or to deliver a great performance? (Or to style hair and makeup superlatively?) As long as movies remain a mirror in which we view our culture and ourselves, we need the Oscars as a way to focus that image even more sharply.

Dr. Samantha Nutt, founder of War Child Canada, finds age and experience a confidence booster

Dr. Nutt on a recent visit to Iraq.

For almost half of her life, Samantha Nutt has worked in a war zone. Even before establishing War Child __canada in 1999, she was on the ground with Unicef, helping alleviate the effects of conflict. Pain, tragedy, displacement, fear, death – these are part of Nutt’s daily vernacular. And she wouldn’t have it any other way.

“I don’t know how not to do it,” she says. “I believe so passionately in tolerance, reason, social good, social responsibility and our capacity to have empathy and connect with another through our common humanity,” she explains. That incorrigible passion has proven an invaluable asset not only in the daily grind but in Nutt’s role as a much-sought after media commentator, including as regular panelist on CBC’s The National.

There may be underlying factors at work, too. “I guess I’ve always been kind of scrappy, maybe because I’m short, maybe because my last name is Nutt,” she says with a laugh.

And age certainly helps. “I think something extraordinary happens when you turn 40 and you just stop looking for approval and permission,” she says with a smile. “One of the most glorious things about aging is that you get a much stronger sense of who you are; you’re less afraid and your confidence just builds. It’s very liberating.”  

It also makes for a bold, fearless and empowered activist. “When people are being cruel, I’m just programmed to jump into the fray and defend what I believe in. It would be a lot easier if I didn’t feel that way.”

Perhaps so, but it would certainly make it harder for War Child to meet its mission of helping hundreds of thousands of children every year in war-affected areas, with education, training and access to justice. As the face of that mission and a bestselling author, Nutt has grown the organization’s reach and impact, leading to her appointment to the Order of Canada in 2011, among other accolades.

Courtesy Samantha Nutt

And she’s done it while maintaining her roles as assistant professor at the University of Toronto, Fellow at Massey College, public health specialist and family medicine physician at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto for more than 20 years. As to how she juggles it all? She doesn’t. “I don’t juggle anything. I wake up every day and deal with whatever is on fire,” she admits. “I frequently feel so over-extended that I’m not sure I’m doing anything well, but I think that’s a 21st-century condition that many can relate to, especially working parents,” Nutt adds, crediting her strong team at War Child Canada and USA for their exceptional work on the day- to-day management.

It’s also one of the reasons she remains so committed to her Thursday night and Friday sessions at the hospital, a position she particularly enjoys for its comparatively simper goal and straightforward asks. “In many ways it’s the complete opposite of the other part of what I do, which often seems so big and irreversible.”

Yet, big and irreversible seem to be her thing. To be sure, the obstacles in her way have taken on a whole new dimension over the years. Security, for one, has become far more intense than when she started out in Somalia in her early twenties. It used to be you could travel in a clearly marked NGO car and be afforded a certain safety net. Today, attacks on aid workers make the job of getting to people in need much more complicated and often life-threatening. It’s one of the reasons War Child has tweaked its model, focusing less on bringing foreigners overseas and more on building up local capacity and long-term partnerships.

People are good at reacting to emergency situations but when issues appear less immediate, there’s a tendency to move onto the “next big urgency.” That is, until images of toddlers washing up on beaches has them wondering how that could have happened. But, with her front-row seat at the world’s calamities, watching them barrel towards her “like an avalanche,” Nutt never ceases to be amazed at that reality. “For me professionally, now that I’m entering my 24th year of doing it, that’s the most frustrating part, the biggest challenge,” she says of the need to get people to adopt a long view of the need for preventative measures.

She finds hope in War Child’s success stories, though. Watching kids return to school. And once-functionally illiterate women find employment thanks to literacy, numeracy and market-based skills training. Nutt is particularly encouraged by how these opportunities have a generational impact.

Related

  • As one of few senior women in technology, Janice Diner pays it forward
  • Denise Donlon reflectrs on a fearless career in an industry that's been transformed

Just five years after the most vulnerable Afghani women started attending educational and vocational-training programs, their children boast a 90% enrolment rate. That generational disruption is powerful. “You can disrupt war when there are alternatives on offer and when you’re doing a lot of different things at once – when you’re ending impunity, working with those communities, helping to create the foundation for stability.”

Nutt remains grateful for the successes and the 250 people who work with War Child, some based out of its Canadian and American offices, most working on the ground (with many coming from war zones themselves).

But what gets to her most is when she can’t raise enough money or connect effectively with prospective supporters. “That’s the hardest part for me, emotionally, because it’s very personal; I know just how painful and hard that is for those folks relying on it.”

That personal investment can also make it hard to find a place in both her worlds. “When I am overseas I am a witness, a doctor, a friend. I am there to listen and support. When I am home, my job is to advocate, to raise money, to ensure we can fulfill our commitments to those on the ground.” That reconciliation can be challenging. “Sometimes after being in a war zone I feel terribly disconnected from normal things,” she admits, sharing how at a recent get-together the day after returning from Iraq, it was difficult to find points of commonality even among friends she adored. But after so many years, that period of adjustment is well-trod and anticipated. “It’s familiar to me and that alone is comforting in ways that it couldn’t be when I was younger.” She also knows by now that, “being a lecturing, self-righteous pain in the ass doesn’t advance the cause so I don’t wear it like a badge.”

And no matter what happens out there, she is always grateful for the home and “peaceful, beautiful country’ to which she gets to return. “However hard this work may sometimes be, what I’ve lived through isn’t even a fraction as hard as what those left behind are forced to confront every day. When you remember that you get over yourself pretty quickly.”

A rare corner of finance where women dominate, seeking to better corporate America

Donna Anderson, vice-president and head of corporate governance at T. Rowe Price, in Baltimore, Md.

Once a year, a small group of executives who control trillions of dollars in American companies meet for lunch in Manhattan. Among the things they discuss: pushing for greater say in how companies are run.

It is an elite gathering, but you will not see a single man in a suit in the room. The event, called the Women in Governance lunch, underscores a rare corner in finance where women dominate.

Women hold the top positions in corporate governance at many of the biggest mutual funds and pension funds — deciding which way to vote on the directors of a company board. They make decisions on behalf of teachers, government workers, doctors and most people in the United States who have a 401(k). The corporate governance heads at seven of the 10 largest institutional investors in stocks are now women, according to data compiled by The New York Times. Those investors oversee US$14 trillion in assets.

Corporate governance is playing a growing role within the broader ecosystem of corporate America. Each spring, publicly traded companies hold shareholder meetings and outline business strategy for the coming year. Shareholders like BlackRock, T. Rowe Price and State Street vote on corporate strategy and issues including company board appointments and compensation.

Their votes can go a long way, given the huge stakes these institutions control in U.S. companies. BlackRock holds a stake greater than five per cent in 75 of the 100 largest companies, according to data compiled by Jerry Davis, a professor at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. State Street has more than than five per cent of 23 of the largest companies, while Capital Group owns more than five per cent of 20 of the biggest companies.

That power, however, is rarely wielded to confront companies. Most of the time, these huge institutional investors choose to vote with management.

And their approach contrasts sharply with that of such brash activist billionaires as William A. Ackman and Daniel S. Loeb, who have made a name for themselves as corporate agitators. These investors bring about change by theatrically pounding on the front doors of companies and using the public court of opinion to bully companies into changing their strategies.

Still, the heads of corporate governance at institutional giants say they are working quietly behind the scenes to advocate for greater shareholder rights.

When Donna F. Anderson and her team at T. Rowe Price became concerned at a growing list of public companies that were creating more than one class of stock, effectively giving corporate insiders greater influence and say in the company, they used their vote to make a point. Anderson, head of corporate governance, created a policy to vote against key directors at companies with dual-class share structures like that at Facebook.

Now, Anderson’s team is weighing whether to create a similar policy for gender diversity on corporate boards.

The financial crisis really brought home the
prevalence of the ‘Old Boys Network’ inside
the boardrooms of these financial firms, which
resulted in too much group think.

“We have an interest in seeing more women on boards because there is data that a more diverse board makes better decisions,” said Anderson, who was at Invesco before T. Rowe Price and has been working in the field of corporate governance for two decades.

Efforts by mutual funds to change the behaviour of a company by using the power of a proxy vote is a fairly recent phenomenon. For decades, powerful institutional investors automatically rubber-stamped the decisions of corporate management and boards. At the same, many top executives paid little attention to the concerns of their shareholders.

“Many years ago, for every 10 letters we wrote, we generally heard back from half,” Anderson said. “Now it’s 100 per cent.” Today, companies in which T. Rowe Price holds a large stake will even reach out to the firm unprompted.

The 2008 financial crisis was a turning point for shareholders, said Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the public pension fund.

Sheehan joined the pension fund, CalSTRS, in October 2008, in the depths of the financial crisis after the collapse of Lehman Bros. “Talk about hitting the ground running and seeing what the impact of that crisis was doing to our portfolio,” she said.

The experience was an eye-opener. “I saw it as an opportunity to make our voices known in the debate,” Sheehan said. “What were these directors doing on our behalf? How could shareholders speak up?”

The crisis, she added, “really brought home the prevalence of the ‘Old Boys Network’ inside the boardrooms of these financial firms, which resulted in too much group think.”

The corporate governance team at CalSTRS regularly questions companies on a range of issues including gender diversity and the pay gap between the top executives at a company and the most junior employees. Having women in positions of governance has helped bring these issues to the forefront of the discussion at companies, Sheehan said.

“It reminded me of the old adage: If you want to get something done, put a woman in charge,” she added.

At BlackRock, Michelle Edkins and her team of 30 analyze whether certain corporate directors are being paid too much and whether they have overstayed their terms. If there is a problem, they begin by opening a dialogue with the company.

Edkins, who trained as an economist in New Zealand and took her first position in corporate governance in 1997 by answering an ad in The Financial Times, said women tended to be less confrontational than men, making it easier to address a problem and try to fix it in this way.

“We don’t meet with CEOs and tell them how to remedy the problem,” she said. “It’s a stylistic difference and my observation is that this constructive challenge comes more naturally to women.”

But to some critics, this approach is not yielding change fast enough.

BlackRock’s track record on voting against corporate management reveals that it is taking a slower approach to pushing for change. For example, on the issue of executive pay, during the most recent reporting period, which ended June 30,
BlackRock voted 96.3 per cent of the time to support compensation policies across the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, according to Proxy Insight.

It also voted against every shareholder proposal relating to diversity, environment, governance and social concerns over the last year, according to Proxy Insight.

The record is not much better at other top institutional investors.

Related

  • Meet one of the most important women in global finance
  • Corporate __canada still has a way to go to get women on its boards

Nick Dawson, a co-founder of Proxy Insight, said that while investors treat issues related to environmental, social and governance policies, known in industry parlance as ESG, very seriously, “there is a clear preference for behind-the-scenes engagement on these issues.” “Asset managers prefer to ensure that management teams are capable of dealing with ESG issues in-house, rather than by applying external pressure,” he said.

Still, BlackRock said it voted against pay practices or compensation committee members at 10 of the 50 companies where executives were paid the most during the most recent reporting period.

In one recent case involving Mylan, the company that makes the allergy treatment EpiPen, BlackRock spent two years engaging with the board over the generous pay packages of top executives. When this did not yield a change to compensation, Edkins’ team voted against the three top-earning directors.

And other investors like the activist hedge fund Elliott Management said it had become much easier to engage with companies.

“When an activist shows up to a situation, having these engaged, thoughtful leaders involved in the discussion helps the company and the activist get to a collaborative solution,” said Jesse Cohn, head of U.S. equity activism at Elliott.
This, he added, happens “well in advance of a proxy contest.”

There is concern that on the subject of gender, women are less likely to push for greater diversity. Some women in high-power corporate governance positions said that they preferred not to bring up gender as an issue in discussions with management on concern they will be perceived as having an agenda.

But some experts say there is tremendous potential for the network of women in corporate governance to make a bigger difference.

“If there is an old girls’ network, so to speak, with so much authority in corporate governance, this is an opportunity to create an agenda for greater diversity through a formalized means,” said Davis, at the University of Michigan.

While women like Edkins are fighting behind the scenes to bring more women onto the boards of America’s biggest companies, they are struggling with an entirely different diversity challenge of their own: the lack of men in the field of corporate governance.

“It’s counterintuitive in finance,” Edkins said. “But when we are hiring, we need to really push that diversity to make sure we have men on the slate.”

The important questions: How to write the perfect Oscar speech, thanking God, a Weinstein and yourself

Allow me to set the mood. You are dressed in the most smashing of outfits, with the designer’s name written in smudged black ink on your left hand (soon to be imprinted on the ass of your Oscar statue). Exquisite, yes, but very uncomfortable. It is, however, that very discomfort shooting up your backside that is giving you the desirable posture the frenetic Oscar cams will catch when they pan to you as the nominees in your category are announced – not that your name won’t be called, don’t be ridiculous. (Though practicing one’s losing face in the mirror weeks ahead is encouraged, as it could make for excellent bathroom chitchat.)

The moment your name is called – by a person with an aesthetically pleasing face whose name you can’t remember now – your body breaks into a sudden sweat. Yes. Finally. This is your moment, entirely a product of your own ruthless engineering.

But as tradition dictates, and as the photogenic audience around you expects, you must give a speech that not only highlights Your Moment, but reminds the world that you are humble. The most humble.

Try to avoid molesting the presenter, as you don’t want anything overshadowing the next minute or two of solid gold that is to come spewing out of your mouth. Avoid any gestures such as salutes or fist pumps, as context can often be lost in the kerfuffle and tulle of one’s dress.

First to thank: your parents, those people who provided the sperm and the egg and had the good sense to put them together and ultimately produce the sort of hands that were born to hold a gold statue of a naked man. Sure, they rarely supported your dream, but perhaps they afforded you that goldmine of a rags-to-riches story – the one that has offered you the gravitas you so needed in such a nepotism-fuelled industry. 

You may do well to thank all the other nominees in your category, who may be more seasoned than you, but are certainly not as young and fresh

Next, at least one Weinstein is in order. Preferably before God, Jesus and all the prophets of all the religions. Harvey is your best bet, especially if you’ve decided to brave it and sport a very over Marchesa gown, designed by his wife Georgina Chapman. (Although, if you are wearing Marchesa, you likely are not planning on winning any awards.)

If you’ve been noted for being particularly hungry during this awards season, having campaigned with a vigorous aggression and perhaps even resorting to category fraud, you may do well to thank all the other nominees in your category, who may be more seasoned than you, but are certainly not as young and fresh, having reprised garbled versions of the same clownish character for the last decade. Do away with naming each one – lest you forget a name or the camera catches an expression that becomes more GIF-able than your speech. 

It’s worth mentioning the co-star with the highest wattage in your cast, even if you didn’t share a scene for more than five minutes. They taught you so much. Frankly, just being near them and being given the opportunity to observe their craft was reward enough. Don’t forget all the dutiful soldiers in the crew, toiling away behind the scenes. I mean, they have families.

While we’re on the subject of soldiers: this is a truly political time, and you mustn’t be foolish and miss out on your chance to make a Statement, capital S. And wow, look at the diversity in the room. It’s utterly blinding! And, oh, did you just catch John Legend’s eyes at the La La Land table just now? Cue smile.

Related

  • Why the Oscars — with their lack of awareness and diversity, and abundance of mediocrity — don’t matter
  • Why the Oscars matter, as a lens on culture and a resource for film appreciation
  • #OscarsSoWoke: This year’s Academy Awards are bound to be political, and that’s not a bad thing

Oh dear, it looks like it’s time to wrap up. You somehow managed to stretch the allotted 45 seconds into several minutes – you really are a winner. But yes, you just realized you’ve forgotten to mention your long-suffering spouse, but hey, this is Your Moment, and who knows how eligible you may be now.

Pay no heed when the teleprompter begins flashing and the band starts playing – well-timed speeches are rarely remembered. You’ll do better being gently tugged or better yet dragged offstage as tears pour down your porcelain face, and you reek of passion so strongly, it may as well be your signature scent. In fact, that’s not a bad idea…

How Costco Canada breaks retail rules to win

Ranked the most trusted food retailer in  , Costco flouts the basic retail commandments to tap into consumers’ deepest psychological impulses about security, scarcity, clarity and fear.

TORONTO — Not far from a table stacked high with men’s blue jeans at one of Canada’s busiest Costco Wholesale Corp. stores is a standalone display for the InstaShiatsu, a cordless neck and back massager that bears all the hallmarks of a juicy impulse buy.

Security, scarcity and fear: The five keys to Costco Canada’s success

With 10 million members and $22 billion a year in sales, Costco has defied the odds to achieve staggering success in Canada. Here’s five, rather quirky ways, they bring customers back for more

Priced at $134.99, the InstaShiatsu gives off a quirky, as-seen-on-TV vibe that would not help its cause if it were inside Hudson’s Bay or Best Buy.

But this is Costco, so the InstaShiatsu is flying out the store even though it’s likely nobody who bought one came looking for a neck massaging apparatus.

“We put it on the floor to test it and … explosion,” said Andrée Brien, senior vice-president of national merchandising at Costco Wholesale __canada Ltd., on a recent tour of a warehouse in eastern Toronto.

The product’s apparent success is just another example of how Costco paradoxically breaks all of the Retail 101 rules and wins.

With a perpetually crowded parking lot, an aesthetically uninspiring and often difficult-to-navigate shopping area, and a highly limited choice of products within each category, Costco sells items in quantities that would be more suitable for an army squadron than a household of four. It also doesn’t bag customers’ items. And, just for the privilege of shopping there, Costco charges an annual fee starting at $55.

‘Treasure hunt’ is the mantra that echoes though every corner of Costco Canada

But its contrarian ways are the key to its staggering success in Canada, where Costco has 94 warehouses, more than 10 million members and steadily increasing sales that hit about $22 billion last year. It turns out that its flouting of basic retail commandments actually taps into consumers’ deepest psychological impulses about security, scarcity, clarity and fear.

Take the membership fee. You might think paying one to shop would deter consumers, but studies show memberships can make people bond with institutions.

Laura Pedersen/National Post

“Once you have paid to belong to something, once there is a cost to enter, you feel more strongly attached to it,” said Allison Johnson, a professor of business with a focus on consumer psychology at Ivey Business School in London, Ont. “There is a psychological sunk cost, and an exclusivity. They check your card at the cash. It makes it seem as though there is something going on that is special in there.”

Clearly, it’s working. Costco Canada’s members renew at a rate of 90 per cent and Costco’s membership worldwide grew seven per cent last year.

Another way Costco taps into consumer psychology is by offering a limited selection.

Retail orthodoxy suggests it’s critical to carry a vast assortment of goods. Costco more than two decades ago used to sell 5,500 SKUs — unique merchandise items or “stock-keeping units.” That number has slowly been whittled down to 3,500. To put it in perspective, Walmart and Canadian Tire stores carry about 150,000 SKUs each.

“We thought that by having more, it would produce (higher sales),” Brien said. “But no. By having fewer items in a category, people are not mixed up, and we produce more. The idea behind our approach is we buy it for you. We test the item, and we are confident that we are going to give you the best deal for your money.”

Studies show that offering consumers too much choice can be a deterrent to buying. A seminal study related to this “paradox of choice” in 2000 found that customers presented with six varieties of jam were 10 times more likely to buy a jar than those offered a choice of 24 different jams.

“There is evidence that people like the idea of having more selection, but they are more satisfied when there is less selection after they make the choice,” Johnson said.

We live by our members … People love us, but we have to love them more

Laura Pedersen/National Post

Another Costco tactic that should frustrate customers is its ever-shifting and roving product assortment. About 55 to 60 per cent of Costco’s assortment changes every few weeks, and many regularly stocked items can shift in location.

But moving merchandise around or offering it for a limited time taps into the scarcity principle: people are more motivated to buy something if the assortment of goods appears to be limited or temporary for fear they might miss out entirely.

Related

  • Cocktails, cinemas and concierges: Malls weave a web of their own to entice customers
  • How Sobeys screwed up Safeway in a messy takeover that left empty shelves, massive losses, and drove customers away
  • Why Target Corporation pulled the plug in Canada

“Strategically created scarcity conditions make consumers realize that if they do not get the desired product right away, they will not be able to get it in the future,” said Shipra Gupta, a marketing professor at the University of Illinois, Springfield, in her 2013 University of Nebraska study. Perceived scarcity encourages people to buy items more readily and they do so in order to avoid feelings of regret, a “pervasive and powerful emotion that people try to avoid.”

Brien, a Francophone bundle of energy who visits Costcos on the weekend with her husband “for fun,” said the InstaShiatsu is one of 50 “road show” items that moves every 10 days from one Costco warehouse to another.

The idea behind our approach is we buy it for you … we are confident that we are going to give you the best deal for your money

Laura Pedersen/National Post

“It has been one of our best road shows, and it will not be here for long — treasure hunt,” she said.

“Treasure hunt” is the mantra that echoes though every corner of Costco Canada, from its head office in Ottawa to its highly polished warehouse floors, stacked high with merchandise palettes. During the course of the tour, Brien frequently returns to how critical the treasure hunt is for members.

Its principles are, in essence, all the rules Costco breaks, and its success in Canada has been considerable.

Canada is Costco’s largest international division, representing 43 per cent of the retailer’s warehouse count outside the U.S.

Standard retail theory dictates that an optimal subsidiary has about one-tenth the number of retail outlets of a U.S. operation, given that Canada has 10 per cent of its neighbour’s population.

But Costco Canada has almost 20 per cent of the company’s U.S. store count, and does not appear to be cannibalizing its business despite the higher-than-average penetration.

For the 22 weeks ended Jan. 29, Costco Canada’s same-store sales climbed six per cent over the prior year versus two per cent in the U.S. Within the four-week period in January, same-store sales were up 11 per cent, versus six per cent in the U.S.

One obvious explanation for Costco’s success in Canada is that it does not have a direct competitor. In the U.S., it competes with Sam’s Club, the rival warehouse club run by Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s biggest retailer.

But Sam’s Club failed to catch on with Canadians after it opened here in 2003, when Costco had 61 stores. Walmart gave up in 2009, closing the six warehouses it had opened.

Kevin Grier, a food industry analyst based in Guelph, Ont., said Sam’s Club principally focused on small business customers whereas Costco focused on businesses and a growing customer base of families.

“Costco ended up growing faster than Walmart, and it is widely accepted now by the general consumer as a place to go for food,” Grier said. “They have done so well in terms of gaining share.”

In 2010, CIBC estimated Costco Canada had a seven-per-cent share of food sales in Canada, ahead of Walmart at six per cent. In 2016, CIBC estimated Costco’s share of food at 10 per cent, and Walmart at seven per cent.

Canadians are notoriously price-sensitive, particularly when it comes to food, which has led grocers to become highly price-competitive. Costco’s everyday low price, with a handful of regular and rotating markdowns, might be easier for savings-minded customers to figure out than juggling rival grocers’ discounts.

Bloomberg

Food sales have been key in enticing millions of consumer shoppers to Costco, so much so that it is now turning its attention back to corporate customers. It will open its first business centre in Canada next month to target owners of corner convenience stores, restaurants and small businesses.

“At one time, we served them better than we serve them now,” said Brien, noting the warehouse retailer has added more and more merchandise products catering to families over the years. “If I change my endcap (the end of the aisle display), this business owner doesn’t want to keep guessing where we put the salt that day, he doesn’t want to go through that drama. He wants to know it is always in the same place.”

Costco’s success in Canada also would not have been possible were it not for another advantage it appears to enjoy over its rivals: higher consumer trust scores.

Costco ranks No. 1 in trust among food and drug retailers in Canada, ahead of Shoppers Drug Mart and Loblaw, according to 2016’s annual Gustavson Brand Trust Index, a detailed annual consumer survey.

Similarly, consumers polled in a 2016 Forum Poll named Costco the top retailer in terms of customer satisfaction, with an overall score of 91 out of 100, ahead of Walmart, Winners, Hudson’s Bay and Sears.

Industry experts cite a number of reasons as to why that is: Costco has one of the most liberal return policies in the retail industry, a more consistent employee base and, among mass merchants, a reputation for carrying high-quality products.

“We live by our members, and that membership has a value,” Brien said. “That is why it is so important that the membership renewal rate is so high. People love us, but we have to love them more.”

More than 100 Toronto firefighters extinguish six-alarm blaze at Badminton and Racquet Club

A massive fire that ripped through a Toronto athletic club and forced the evacuation of six buildings in a busy neighbourhood was extinguished early Wednesday, nearly a full day after it began.

Toronto Fire Chief Matthew Pegg said firefighters put out the blaze at The Badminton and Racquet Club around 5:45 a.m. Wednesday, but he noted that crews would likely still have to deal with expected “hot spots” and “flare ups” throughout the day.

No one was seriously injured as more than 100 firefighters at any given time battled the raging fire that sent smoke billowing over a large area of midtown Toronto.

Part of the club’s roof collapsed along with a number of other “partial collapses,” Pegg said. Heavy excavation equipment was brought to the site at one point to knock down walls so that firefighters could get to the “seat” of the blaze.

Thanking @Toronto_Fire for their work today at the Yonge & St. Clair fire https://t.co/L1pYnazth8


John Tory (@JohnTory) February 14, 2017

“There is an extraordinary amount of damage there…I highly doubt there’s going to be a lot of salvageable building left there,” Pegg said.

Still, the chief called the “defensive operation” against the fire a success.

“Our crews were able to prevent a very large fire from spreading into the adjoining structures and that was our number one goal after we had secured the safety of residents and firefighters,” Pegg said.

Only four people needed emergency shelter overnight as everyone else found a place to stay with friends and family, he said, adding he’s unsure how many people have been displaced by the fire.

Two firefighters suffered minor injuries, he said, including one twisted ankle.

With the blaze put out, clean-up efforts can begin, Pegg said.

The first priority is dealing with the large volume of water that has run off and seeped into nearby buildings and hydro vaults as a result of fighting the fire.

Hydro and natural gas lines remain shut off and air quality has to be tested in numerous buildings, Pegg said.

“It’s going to take us a little more time,” he said.

The Office of the Fire Marshal was expected to begin its investigation into the incident Wednesday, but Pegg noted that it was still too early to know what had caused the fire.

Stan Behal/Postmedia Network

The Badminton and Racquet Club said in an email to club members that “the fire appears to have originated in the main lounge.”

Chief operating officer Paul Cadieux thanked members and staff “for their quick action” to help clear the building.

Subway service has resumed service at the neighbourhood’s local station, which was being bypassed yesterday.

Yonge Street, a major nearby thoroughfare, remained closed in both directions at St. Clair Avenue, but streetcar service had resumed, according to the Toronto Transit Commission.

Stan Behal/Postmedia Network
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press
Christopher Katsarov / The Canadian Press

Roof collapse at 4 Alarm fire at Yonge + St. Clair! @cp24breakingnews #fire #stclair #yonge

A post shared by Andrew Sit (@andrew_sit) on